Huge erratic boulders in Tonga deposited by a prehistoric tsunami
- Cliff Frohlich1,*,
- Matthew J. Hornbach1,
- Frederick W. Taylor1,
- Chuan-Chou Shen2,
- 'Apai Moala3,
- Allan E. Morton4 and
- Jens Kruger5
- 1Institute for Geophysics, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758-4445, USA
- 2Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, Republic of China
- 3Geology Section, Ministry of Lands, Survey, and Natural Resources, Nuku'alofa, Tonga
- 4343 Harvard Avenue, Rexburg, Idaho 83440, USA
- 5SOPAC, South Pacific Islands Applied Geoscience Commission, Nabua, Fiji Islands
- *E-mail: cliff{at}ig.utexas.edu.
Abstract
Along some coastlines there are erratic boulders apparently emplaced by tsunamis or cyclonic storms; evaluating their origin and time of emplacement places constraints on the frequency, severity, and location of coastal hazards. Seven such large coral limestone boulders are present near Fahefa village on Tongatapu Island, southwest Pacific, apparently emplaced by a prehistoric tsunami. These boulders are 10–20 m above sea level and above any possible source, and all are 100–400 m from the present shoreline. Coral 230Th ages indicate that the limestone formed during the last interglacial sea-level highstand, ca. 120–130 ka. The largest boulder is ~20 times more massive than any reported boulders emplaced by historically documented storms and may be the largest known tsunami or storm erratic worldwide situated above its source. We performed computer simulations to assess whether tsunamis produced by earthquakes, undersea landslides, or volcanoes could emplace the boulders. The simulations indicate that either volcanic flank collapse along the Tofua arc ~30–40 km to the southwest or undersea landslides on the submarine slopes of Tongatapu could be responsible. Either could explain why these boulders are not widespread on Tongatapu, and instead occur in a localized group along the western coast. This study demonstrates that small (<1 km3) submarine slope failures sometimes generate locally large tsunamis. The Fahefa boulders are in a well-studied and well-populated area, yet were unknown to the scientific community until recently; this suggests that systematic searches elsewhere for erratic boulders and other tsunami deposits might provide new information for assessing the size and extent of prehistoric tsunamis.
Footnotes
-
↵1 GSA Data Repository item 2009036, Section DR1 (dating of coral samples), Section DR2 (estimating wave heights), Section DR3 (computer modeling), Table DR1 (locations and basic characteristics of erratic boulders on southwestern Tongatapu), Table DR2 (uranium and thorium isotopic compositions and 230Th ages for Tonga coral fossils), Table DR3 (parameters used for modeling slides and volcanic flank collapse), and Figure DR1 (validation of age-determination method), is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2009.htm, or on request from editing{at}geosociety.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.
-
- Received 20 June 2008.
- Revision received 25 September 2008.
- Accepted 6 October 2008.
- © 2009 Geological Society of America












