A refractory mantle protolith in younger continental crust, east-central China: Age and composition of zircon in the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure peridotite

  1. Jianping Zheng1,
  2. W.L. Griffin2,
  3. Suzanne Y. O'Reilly3,
  4. J.S. Yang4 and
  5. R.Y. Zhang5
  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China, and GEMOC ARC National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia
  2. 2GEMOC ARC National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia, and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Exploration and Mining, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
  3. 3GEMOC ARC National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia
  4. 4Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
  5. 5Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    Abstract

    Zircons have been extracted from garnet peridotite and its wall rock (gneiss), which was intersected by the pre–pilot hole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling project (CCSD-PP1) in the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic belt. The peridotitic zircons record early Mesozoic UHP metamorphism (206Pb/238U age of 223.5 ± 7.5 Ma), but their Hf isotope compositions indicate that the protolith of the peridotite is at least Mesoproterozoic in age (minimum depleted-mantle ages [TDM] of 1.4 Ga). Zircons from the gneiss also reflect the Mesozoic metamorphism, with a cluster of 206Pb/238U ages at 224.5 ± 11.5 Ma; a trail of discordant grains indicates a protolith age older than 800 Ma, consistent with TDM model ages of younger than 1.2 Ga. The peridotitic zircons have trace-element patterns similar to kimberlitic and/or carbonatitic zircons, while those from the gneiss have affinities with zircons from syenites/monzonites. The differences suggest that the metasomatic agents that affected the peridotitic zircons were derived from the asthenospheric mantle rather than from subducted continental crust. The strong depletion of the CCSD-PP1 peridotite in basaltic components, and the relatively unradiogenic Hf isotopic compositions (e.g., −16.3 to ∼−13.8 εHf) of the peridotitic zircons, indicate that the peridotitic body is a fragment of refractory Archean mantle that experienced Mesoproterozoic metasomatism and represents a tectonic intrusion into younger crust.

    Footnotes

    • GSA Data Repository item 2006147, Figures DR1 and DR2, and Tables DR1–DR4, is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2006.htm, or on request from editing{at}geosociety.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA.

      • Accepted 31 March 2006.
      • Received 5 January 2006.
      • Revision received 28 March 2006.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents